🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions about that remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over the American player during the US Open last eight. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment was appropriate. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, me too. But come on. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, who Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in press following his defeat that he actually preferred his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the top three players in the sport in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, 28, is ranked number four in the world starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite delivery and powerful strength on each forehand and reverse side are more than adequate to dispose of most rivals on the ATP tour. Against the select few generational talents, however, he is frequently helpless. The last several seasons has seen the curious rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless move around with the alarming quickness and fluidity of much shorter players. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a drop shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a number of significant, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded to No 4 – and held the position. But the next leap, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing drought of US male players winning grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the Wimbledon last four in July.

The American's play in that very last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a few championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair looked evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz creating plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of frustration. When he eventually did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a horrendous service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Facing match points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the contest two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a consequence of having to hit too many second serves.

The contest was fairly compelling proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of Djokovic, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only express his emotions or the tactic he felt decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for America failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it forever if I fail to do it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {